This site doesn't have a favicon, and it likely never will.
I'm not 100% sure why I feel so strongly about that decision, but considering the fact that I don't have a logo—nor do I really want one—setting up a favicon felt unnecessary.
But, you can't just not define a favicon (via the
<link rel="shortcut icon" /> tag), because most web browsers will try to request one anyway. This means that every page load is accompanied by a second request for a
favicon.ico file that will always come back as
So, what are we to do?
While we could just slap together a transparent
favicon.ico and be done with it, I wanted to eliminate that second request, not just serve up a perfunctory image to appease my need for a successful response.
While omitting the icon tag doesn't give the results we want, I decided to experiment with values that do. My first attempt at this was to use a simple hash:
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="#" />
While this eliminated the
404 Not Found response in the favicon request, it ended up re-requesting the entire page. This makes sense, as the
# ultimately gets interpreted by the browser as
https://flower.codes/#, and the same is true for pretty much every other character you might want to try (spaces, question marks, etc).
Not a proper solution.
Enter Data URLs
So, we can't omit the favicon, and we can't use an arbitrary character... what can we do?
After a little bit of digging, I came across a concept that most web developers are fairly familiar with: Data URLs.
For the uninitiated, Data URIs allow you to embed files directly inline in your HTML, rather than making an external request. To be overly simplistic, they generally consist of a definition of the type of file to be loaded (such as
text/plain) and the file contents (which can be encoded to reduce the number of characters).
This means that instead of loading an external file, you can include it inline like so:
For our purposes, though, we can define a Data URL that is effectively empty by simply omitting both the content type and the contents themselves:
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="data:," />
Okay, But... Why??
As expected, this solved my problem. By including the content directly, and keeping it empty, we can eliminate the second request without inducing any errors in the console.
But, why go through all this trouble?
Believe it or not, I actually like favicons. I think they make organizing tabs and bookmarks far easier. But in a world (wide web) filled with them, eschewing one on my own site felt like a small way to stand out (and going the extra mile to do it the "right" way is just icing on the cake).
This is post 010 of #100DaysToOffload